My posts

List of things I’ve published about, or related to, the conflict between Gøtzsche and the rest of the Cochrane Collaboration (* means it's also about HPV vaccines):

• May 2002: although he is not named, this piece on page 4 of Cochrane News was the first thing I published about this.
• * 4 September 2018, last updated 30 September: The HPV vaccine & manufactured controversy: tracking the critique of the Cochrane review & the evidence.
• * 18 September 2018: Boilover: the Cochrane HPV vaccine fire isn’t really about the evidence – but it’s critical to science.
• 24 September 2018: Scientific advocacy and biases of the ideological and industry kinds.

List of things I’ve written about the HPV vaccine debate, in addition to those marked * above:

• 25 August 2018: The HPV vaccine: a critique of a critique of a meta-analysis.
• 31 August 2018: The HPV vaccine should be preventing cervical cancer: can we tell whether it actually is?
• 31 October 2018: Free speech and journals’ responsibility in vaccine debates.
• 16 November 2018: Correcting the record on that critique of the Cochrane HPV vaccine review.
• 28 February 2020: The high risk methods of a new systematic review of HPV vaccines.
• 28 February 2020: journal commentary accompanying Jørgensen, Gøtzsche, and Jefferson HPV vaccines review: What the systematic review of HPV vaccine clinical study reports does, and does not, reveal: commentary on Jørgensen et al.

[References]

Please see note on sources in the introduction.

[1] Peter Gøtzsche’s 66-page response to a confidential report by a lawyer commissioned by the Cochrane Collaboration dated 30 August 2018. Via Gøtzsche’s personal website.

[2] Appendix 12 of the above [1].

[3] The confidential report by the lawyer, mentioned above.